<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Dave Enjoys &#187; Top-level domain</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.daveenjoys.com/tag/top-level-domain/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.daveenjoys.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 05:23:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Pornography Prevalence&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.daveenjoys.com/2010/06/05/pornography-prevalence/</link>
		<comments>http://www.daveenjoys.com/2010/06/05/pornography-prevalence/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jun 2010 17:01:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>davemackey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[household]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[.xxx]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexual Addiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top-level domain]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daveenjoys.com/?p=477</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Take a moment to visit <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-17852_3-20006703-71.html?part=rss&#38;amp;subj=news&#38;amp;tag=2547-1_3-0-20">Chris Matyszczyk&#8217;s blog and view a visual chart of internet pornography utilization</a>. I&#8217;m not sure, but I ponder whether the .xxx TLD would not be a good idea (though I know most evangelicals seem to disagree). To me, it would provide a very simple way to corner porn companies [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Take a moment to visit <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-17852_3-20006703-71.html?part=rss&amp;amp;subj=news&amp;amp;tag=2547-1_3-0-20">Chris Matyszczyk&#8217;s blog and view a visual chart of internet pornography utilization</a>. I&#8217;m not sure, but I ponder whether the .xxx TLD would not be a good idea (though I know most evangelicals seem to disagree). To me, it would provide a very simple way to corner porn companies into one area of the market and it would allow for criminal prosecution of individuals who pursue consumers outside of the .xxx designation. It would also make porn filtering (at least of &#8220;legal&#8221; sites) much simpler.</p>
<div class="zemanta-pixie" style="margin-top: 10px; height: 15px;"><a class="zemanta-pixie-a" title="Reblog this post [with Zemanta]" href="http://reblog.zemanta.com/zemified/dc9a802b-6b8b-43cc-a46a-0c54c64e5705/"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" style="border: medium none; float: right;" src="http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=dc9a802b-6b8b-43cc-a46a-0c54c64e5705" alt="Reblog this post [with Zemanta]" /></a><span class="zem-script more-related pretty-attribution"><script src="http://static.zemanta.com/readside/loader.js" type="text/javascript"></script></span></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.daveenjoys.com/2010/06/05/pornography-prevalence/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.daveenjoys.com/tag/top-level-domain/feed/ ) in 0.36983 seconds, on Feb 10th, 2012 at 5:13 pm UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 10th, 2012 at 6:13 pm UTC -->
