<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Dave Enjoys &#187; movies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.daveenjoys.com/tag/movies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.daveenjoys.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 05:23:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Thoughts on 9.</title>
		<link>http://www.daveenjoys.com/2009/09/12/thoughts-on-9/</link>
		<comments>http://www.daveenjoys.com/2009/09/12/thoughts-on-9/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 16:22:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>davemackey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Academy Award]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Animation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Johnny Depp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nightmare Before Christmas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[post-modern]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spirituality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[steampunk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stitchpunk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tim Burton]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daveenjoys.com/?p=318</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>9 is a new animated film based upon an <a class="zem_slink freebase/guid/9202a8c04000641f8000000000003bfb" title="Academy Award" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Academy_Award">Academy Award</a> nominated short of the same name. The film attracts attention for a intriguing preview, an all-star cast, and (perhaps most importantly) the attachment of <a class="zem_slink freebase/guid/9202a8c04000641f800000000003dd87" title="Tim Burton" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tim_Burton">Tim Burton</a>&#8216;s name to the film (as a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>9 is a new animated film based upon an <a class="zem_slink freebase/guid/9202a8c04000641f8000000000003bfb" title="Academy Award" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Academy_Award">Academy Award</a> nominated short of the same name. The film attracts attention for a intriguing preview, an all-star cast, and (perhaps most importantly) the attachment of <a class="zem_slink freebase/guid/9202a8c04000641f800000000003dd87" title="Tim Burton" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tim_Burton">Tim Burton</a>&#8216;s name to the film (as a producer). But don&#8217;t expect your normal animated tale &#8211; not even your <em>normal</em> abnormal tale from Tim Burton (ala The <a class="zem_slink freebase/guid/9202a8c04000641f8000000000220d76" title="The Nightmare Before Christmas" rel="imdb" href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0107688/">Nightmare</a> Before Christmas and The <a class="zem_slink freebase/guid/9202a8c04000641f8000000000507393" title="Tim Burton's Corpse Bride [Blu-ray]" rel="amazon" href="http://www.amazon.com/Tim-Burtons-Corpse-Bride-Blu-ray/dp/B000I5XOWI%3FSubscriptionId%3D0G81C5DAZ03ZR9WH9X82%26tag%3Damericancivilw-20%26linkCode%3Dxm2%26camp%3D2025%26creative%3D165953%26creativeASIN%3DB000I5XOWI">Corpse Bride</a>).</p>
<p><strong>For Children?</strong></p>
<p>While the merits of allowing children to watch <a class="zem_slink" title="Tim Burton's the Nightmare Before Christmas (Manga)" rel="amazon" href="http://www.amazon.com/Burtons-Nightmare-Before-Christmas-Manga/dp/0786838493%3FSubscriptionId%3D0G81C5DAZ03ZR9WH9X82%26tag%3Damericancivilw-20%26linkCode%3Dxm2%26camp%3D2025%26creative%3D165953%26creativeASIN%3D0786838493">Tim Burton&#8217;s The Nightmare Before Christmas</a> or The Corpse Bride may be questionable at best, 9 seems to push far beyond the macabre and dark humor of these <a class="zem_slink freebase/guid/9202a8c04000641f8000000000016b94" title="Film" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Film">films</a>. We should have known when the MPAA chose to rate 9 PG-13 while Nightmare and Corpse had both received only PG ratings.</p>
<p>The entire premise of 9 is dark &#8211; a post-apocalyptic world in which humanity has been utterly destroyed and only stitchpunk dolls imbued with a soul survive. The stitchpunk dolls stumbling over the dead bodies of humans &#8211; soldiers, women, and children &#8211; is disturbing enough but the real scares are reserved for the horrifying mechanical monstrosities the stitchpunk dolls must face.</p>
<p><strong>But Is It Good?</strong></p>
<p>In spite of Tim Burton&#8217;s strangeness many thoroughly enjoy his films &#8211; and his repeated pairing with <a class="zem_slink freebase/guid/9202a8c04000641f8000000000083781" title="Johnny Depp" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johnny_Depp">Johnny Depp</a> &#8211; but this film is so different from Burton films that one has to consider it on its own merits. It should not be considered a Burton film (and it is not, though he participated Acker is the main brains).</p>
<p>The film is beautifully rendered (even the dark and morbid aspects are done with artistic finesse). One is drawn into the world and with a little imagination the film world takes on a reality all its own. That said, after twenty minutes I was fidgeting and wishing, &#8220;When will this film end?&#8221; The storyline consists almost entirely of stitchpunks fighting monsters &#8211; defeating or semi-defeating monsters &#8211; and then repeating the cycle. The fight scenes are amazingly rendered, the explosions and conflicts engrossing &#8211; but while the enemies vary it feels somewhat like an old-fashioned nintendo video game in which the levels repeat over and over with little variation.</p>
<p>Further, the film is painful to watch &#8211; not because of the elimination of humanity but because of the constant and growing suffering of the stitchpunks. While one never gets extremely attached to the stitchpunks the minute rendering of the terror of the suffering and the mourning of those left behind is agonizing. At times I wondered, &#8220;Will this film end with defeat?&#8221; For most of the film its defeat piled upon defeat. Hope is smashed repeatedly and the world draws ever closer to oblivion. Each chance at victory is spoiled and with it another character is heart wrenchingly destroyed.</p>
<p><strong>But Does It Teach Us?</strong></p>
<p>A film can be painful and boring and yet still have a deeply powerful message. Unfortunately, while 9 had great potential to engage us on important cultural and spiritual topics &#8211; it falls flat. It tackles a number of interesting ideas but with such brevity and amidst so many distractions that the opportunity for discussion is nearly lost. Here are a few implications I drew from the film (I am not indicating agreement with this ideas &#8211; personally I hold a <a class="zem_slink freebase/guid/9202a8c04000641f800000000002e1b8" title="Protestantism" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protestantism">Protestant Christian</a> worldview):</p>
<ul>
<li>The stitchpunks creation/existence correlates with human creation. In this sense, we are <em>god</em> and <em>god</em> ceased to exist as a separate entity in order to create us.</li>
<li><em>god</em> was/is not a greater intelligence but rather another intelligence. The act of creation was an act of survival rather than an act of infinite wisdom and grace.</li>
<li>1 represents institutional religion/political order. These are safe but prevent us from experiencing progress.</li>
<li>9 is a post-modern revolutionary who attempts to move humanity forward. 9&#8242;s attempts result in great suffering for mankind. While revolutionary and de-construction may result in gradual advancement, the costs are extremely high.</li>
<li>A dystopian view of technological/scientific advancement. Our advancements will one day destroy us.</li>
<li>At the same time, an endorsement of radical innovation and rebellion (as 9 epitomizes), yet seemingly with less of a focus on technological/scientific advancement.</li>
<li>The death of stitchpunks and the release of their souls is the food to renew the world, to start the evolutionary process again from the beginning.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Concluding Remarks:</strong></p>
<p>9 is well-done artistically and may be viewed on these merits with enjoyment. Those looking for deep, thought provoking storylines and a enjoyable viewing will be disappointed. The worldview presented by the movie &#8211; or the extrapolations which one may carry from it &#8211; will be disconcerting to many audiences. The film should be watched with a contemplative eye that understands the worldview presented and adequately responds to the truths and untruths presented. The film is certainly not for children. It is not unnecessarily gory, but it is continually suspenseful, frightening in its tension, and dark in its portrayal of death and life.</p>
<div class="zemanta-pixie" style="margin-top: 10px; height: 15px;"><a class="zemanta-pixie-a" title="Reblog this post [with Zemanta]" href="http://reblog.zemanta.com/zemified/b67dbf19-1da1-482f-86a4-8b13192bdc76/"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" style="border: medium none; float: right;" src="http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=b67dbf19-1da1-482f-86a4-8b13192bdc76" alt="Reblog this post [with Zemanta]" /></a><span class="zem-script more-related more-info pretty-attribution paragraph-reblog"><script src="http://static.zemanta.com/readside/loader.js" type="text/javascript"></script></span></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.daveenjoys.com/2009/09/12/thoughts-on-9/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Christopher Nolan (Batman Begins, The Dark Knight)</title>
		<link>http://www.daveenjoys.com/2008/08/03/christopher-nolan-batman-begins-the-dark-knight/</link>
		<comments>http://www.daveenjoys.com/2008/08/03/christopher-nolan-batman-begins-the-dark-knight/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 00:34:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>davemackey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Academy Award]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Batman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Batman Begins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bruce Wayne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christopher Nolan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dark Knight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Gordon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daveenjoys.com/?p=46</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Batman_begins.jpg"></a>Image via <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Batman_begins.jpg">Wikipedia</a> <p>There is plenty of garbage out there. Then there is your average, and finally there is the gems &#8211; the real quality stuff. C.S. Lewis, Philip Pullman, <a class="zem_slink" title="Stephen R. Lawhead" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephen_R._Lawhead" rel="wikipedia">Stephen Lawhead</a>, <a class="zem_slink" title="George MacDonald" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_MacDonald" rel="wikipedia">George MacDonald</a>, John Piper, Kyle Strobel &#8211; these men are [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="zemanta-img" style="margin: 1em; float: right; display: block;"><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Batman_begins.jpg"><img style="display: block;" src="http://www.daveenjoys.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/202px-Batman_begins1.jpg" alt="Batman Begins" /></a><span class="zemanta-img-attribution">Image via <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Batman_begins.jpg">Wikipedia</a></span></div>
<p>There is plenty of garbage out there. Then there is your average, and finally there is the gems &#8211; the real quality stuff. C.S. Lewis, Philip Pullman, <a class="zem_slink" title="Stephen R. Lawhead" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephen_R._Lawhead" rel="wikipedia">Stephen Lawhead</a>, <a class="zem_slink" title="George MacDonald" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_MacDonald" rel="wikipedia">George MacDonald</a>, John Piper, Kyle Strobel &#8211; these men are authors who exemplify this sort of quality. But what about in film? One name that turns my head every time he associated with a project is <a class="zem_slink" title="Christopher Nolan" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christopher_Nolan" rel="wikipedia">Christopher Nolan</a> (another is <a class="zem_slink" title="M. Night Shyamalan" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M._Night_Shyamalan" rel="wikipedia">M. Night Shymalan</a>, though The Happening was a complete disappointment). Nolan appeared out of nowhere in 1996 with the Following, built on a $6,000 budget. This was followed by Memento in 2000, a cult hit that secured him a <a class="zem_slink" title="Academy Award" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Academy_Award" rel="wikipedia">Academy Award</a> for best screenplay. He secured <a class="zem_slink" title="Al Pacino" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al_Pacino" rel="wikipedia">Al Pacino</a>, Robin Williams, and Hilary Swank to star in his Insomnia, a remake of a European film released in 2002. It wasn&#8217;t until he released <a class="zem_slink" title="Batman Begins" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Batman_Begins" rel="wikipedia">Batman Begins</a> that his name became one common for table banter. He followed this up with The Prestige and then most recently <a class="zem_slink" title="The Dark Knight (film)" href="http://thedarkknight.warnerbros.com/" rel="homepage">The Dark Knight</a> &#8211; continuing the Batman saga[1. I have not seen all of Nolan's films, as such I cannot recommend all of them. Additionally, his films are generally dark and some of his films (e.g. Memento) are gruesome and profane.].</p>
<p>Today I&#8217;d like to talk about some of my interpretations of his most recent film &#8211; The Dark Knight. I think it has an amazing number of subtexts which are worth analysis. I&#8217;ll warn right off the get-go that I&#8217;ll be offering spoilers throughout in giving my analysis.</p>
<ul>
<ul>
<li><a class="zem_slink" title="Joker (comics)" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joker_%28comics%29" rel="wikipedia">The Joker</a> (played amazingly by Heath Ledger) and his minions represent terrorists and radical islam[2. I am not suggesting that all or even the majority of Muslims are extremists, rather this is a minority - but a deadly minority nonetheless. It is worth reminding ourselves of the spotted histories of our own cultures and religious beliefs.]. <a class="zem_slink" title="Alfred Pennyworth" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alfred_Pennyworth" rel="wikipedia">Alfred Pennyworth</a> (<a class="zem_slink" title="Batman" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Batman" rel="wikipedia">Bruce Wayne</a>&#8216;s butler) warns that some, for ideological reasons, simply cannot be reasoned with stating of an enemy he had once fought, &#8220;&#8230;he thought it was good sport. Because some men aren&#8217;t looking for anything logical, like money. They can&#8217;t be bought, bullied, reasoned or negotiated with. Some men just want to watch the world burn.&#8221;</li>
<li>Harvey Dent represents good men who have gone bad fighting unbelievable evil. How often do we hear of the soldier who kills innocent civilians after watching a fellow soldier mercilessly murdered or a woman ravaged? The point is that even good men can be tempted and fall when confronted with insurmountable evils. Not that this excuses the behavior, it simply helps us make sense of the unfathomable &#8211; how good people do such bad things.</li>
<li>Batman &#8211; <a class="zem_slink" title="James Gordon (comics)" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Gordon_%28comics%29" rel="wikipedia">James Gordon</a>, the Police Commissioner tells his son, &#8220;&#8230;he&#8217;s the hero Gotham deserves, but not the one it needs right now&#8230;and so we&#8217;ll hunt him, because he can take it. Because he&#8217;s not a hero. He&#8217;s a silent guardian, a watchful protector&#8230;a dark knight.&#8221; In this Gordon recognizes the need for operations which are generally considered unethical and illegal in times of extreme distress. In this way <a class="zem_slink" title="Batman" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Batman" rel="wikipedia">Batman/Bruce Wayne</a> represents some of our CIA/FBI/SpecOps who take the fall for necessary but illegitimate operations of our government[3. I am not defending all the actions perpetrated by our government, nor even potentially the majority of them. Our government has performed a disturbing number of atrocities and acts driven only by selfishness and greed throughout its history.]. Again Alfred tells Batman that he must, &#8220;Endure, Master Wayne. Take it. They&#8217;ll hate you for it. But that&#8217;s the point of Batman, he can be the outcast. He can make the choice that no one else can make, the right choice.&#8221;</li>
<li>The Mob &#8211; Representative of traditional opposition. The criminals themselves recognize that there is a difference in motivation between themselves and the terrorists. This is not to suggest that their deeds are less evil but that there motivation is less ideologically driven allowing for more compromise and reasoning.</li>
</ul>
</ul>
<p><iframe style="width: 120px; height: 240px; float: left;" src="http://rcm.amazon.com/e/cm?t=daveenjoys-20&amp;o=1&amp;p=8&amp;l=as1&amp;asins=B00005JNJV&amp;fc1=000000&amp;IS2=1&amp;lt1=_blank&amp;m=amazon&amp;lc1=0000FF&amp;bc1=000000&amp;bg1=FFFFFF&amp;f=ifr" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" width="320" height="240"></iframe></p>
<ul>
<li><a class="zem_slink" title="Rachel Dawes" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rachel_Dawes" rel="wikipedia">Rachel Dawes</a> &#8211; The death of Rachel reminds us of the loss of our soldiers overseas &#8211; and sometimes of the loss of innocent lives. At some point, Alfred again as the voice of wisdom asks, &#8220;Didn&#8217;t you think before starting this some people might die?&#8221; We know the right path of action and yet oftentimes when we embark on this path we lose our resolve as the losses mount. What is right is determined no longer right when the cost mounts too high.</li>
</ul>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>There are so many interesting messages within both films (though Batman Begins is of an entirely different tenor). I&#8217;d recommend them both as entertaining, realistic, and with valuable subtexts to be mined. At the same time I would warn that true to Nolan&#8217;s style they do not hedge away from evil and while maintaining <a class="zem_slink" title="Motion Picture Association of America film rating system" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motion_Picture_Association_of_America_film_rating_system" rel="wikipedia">PG-13</a> ratings are dark films not only in places but in their entire tenor.</p>
<p>And, of course, while I am extremely sad over Ledger&#8217;s death his portrayal of Joker in this film makes a fitting culmination to an extremely talented and versatile actor&#8217;s career.</p>
<p><strong>Bibliography:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christopher_Nolan">Wikipedia on Christopher Nolan</a>.</li>
<li><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Dark_Knight_(film)">Wikipedia on The Dark Knight</a>.</li>
<li><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0468569/quotes">IMDb Quotes from The Dark Knight</a>.</li>
</ul>
<div class="zemanta-pixie" style="margin-top: 10px; height: 15px;"><a class="zemanta-pixie-a" title="Enhanced by Zemanta" href="http://www.zemanta.com/"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" style="float: right;" src="http://img.zemanta.com/zemified_e.png?x-id=75b2a806-02c6-49a1-ab29-3a7372f66e17" alt="Enhanced by Zemanta" /></a></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.daveenjoys.com/2008/08/03/christopher-nolan-batman-begins-the-dark-knight/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Netflix &#8211; A Movie Watching Extravanganza.</title>
		<link>http://www.daveenjoys.com/2008/07/14/netflix-a-movie-watching-extravanganza/</link>
		<comments>http://www.daveenjoys.com/2008/07/14/netflix-a-movie-watching-extravanganza/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 19:46:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>davemackey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blockbuster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DVD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[episodes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITunes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[library]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movielink]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Netflix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rental shop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television program]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tv]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daveenjoys.com/?p=20</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps a year ago I wrote an article praising <a class="zem_slink" title="Blockbuster Inc." href="http://www.blockbuster.com/" rel="homepage">Blockbuster</a> Total Access and explaining why I preferred the service above <a class="zem_slink" title="Netflix" href="http://www.netflix.com/" rel="homepage">Netflix</a> &#8211; now the tables have totally turned. What happened? Well the main factor was Blockbuster&#8217;s decision to essentially kill the Total Access program. They performed [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 195px"><a href="http://www.crunchbase.com/company/netflix"><img class="zemanta-img-inserted zemanta-img-configured" title="Image representing Netflix as depicted in Crun..." src="http://www.daveenjoys.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/17200v1-max-450x450.png" alt="Image representing Netflix as depicted in Crun..." width="185" height="64" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Image via CrunchBase</p></div>
<p>Perhaps a year ago I wrote an article praising <a class="zem_slink" title="Blockbuster Inc." href="http://www.blockbuster.com/" rel="homepage">Blockbuster</a> Total Access and explaining why I preferred the service above <a class="zem_slink" title="Netflix" href="http://www.netflix.com/" rel="homepage">Netflix</a> &#8211; now the tables have totally turned. What happened? Well the main factor was Blockbuster&#8217;s decision to essentially kill the Total Access program. They performed price hikes several times within a several month period &#8211; the last one to somewhere around $40/mo. The second factor which killed Blockbuster was Netflix&#8217;s offering of Watch Now, which allowed instant availability of several thousand <a class="zem_slink" title="Film" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Film" rel="wikipedia">movies</a> and <a class="zem_slink" title="Television program" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Television_program" rel="wikipedia">television shows</a> for free with a paid Netflix <a class="zem_slink" title="DVD" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DVD" rel="wikipedia">DVD</a> subscription. Blockbuster could have been ahead in this game, but dawdled for reasons unknown to me and even now after acquiring market leader in online <a class="zem_slink" title="Rental shop" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rental_shop" rel="wikipedia">video rentals</a> <a class="zem_slink" title="Movielink" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Movielink" rel="wikipedia">Movielink</a> they still lack a program similar to Netflix. All that to say &#8211; its possible in six months if Blockbuster gets their act together again that I may switch back and write another article &#8211; but it will only be if Netflix completely drops the ball like the great Blockbuster already has.</p>
<p>But enough analysis, let&#8217;s talk about the Netflix service. The most common program costs $17.99/mo. and gets you three DVD&#8217;s at a time. You can have a queue of up to 500 DVD&#8217;s (why the limit Netflix?) at any given time. When you return a DVD they send you another. While I have three-at-a-time I rarely use this service anymore, instead preferring to utilize Netflix&#8217;s Watch Now service which offers thousands of movies and television episodes instantly and for free. Netflix has also just begin offering an inexpensive set-top box that you can use to effortlessly view these on-demand episodes/movies on your television set.</p>
<p>What is the future for Netflix? If they are smart they will begin offering their entire collection via the Watch Now service. They should consider utilizing technology from a company like <a class="zem_slink" title="Joost" href="http://www.crunchbase.com/company/joost" rel="crunchbase">Joost</a> or <a class="zem_slink" title="BitTorrent (protocol)" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BitTorrent_%28protocol%29" rel="wikipedia">Bittorrent</a> to faciliate reduced bandwidth and storage costs. If they can&#8217;t afford to allow all movies to be instantly viewable, they need to acquire or start a service similar to Movielink and offer discounted prices on instant movie purchases &#8211; e.g. even $2/title would ensure I stayed home and used their service rather than visit Blockbuster or download from <a class="zem_slink" title="ITunes" href="http://www.apple.com/itunes/" rel="homepage">iTunes</a>.</p>
<p>Netflix makes financial sense. Its significantly less expensive than cable ($50+/mo.), costs the same as four DVD rentals from blockbuster (at nearly $5/ea.), and reduces gas expenses. Alternatively, if one has a good local library many have begun stocking a significant DVD collection there as well. One can also go for a lower Netflix program &#8211; as low as $9.95/mo. one still receives the Watch Now service.</p>
<div class="zemanta-pixie" style="margin-top: 10px; height: 15px;"><a class="zemanta-pixie-a" title="Enhanced by Zemanta" href="http://www.zemanta.com/"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" style="float: right;" src="http://img.zemanta.com/zemified_e.png?x-id=e23ed991-b1e4-4419-bfbe-146ad872bcd0" alt="Enhanced by Zemanta" /></a></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.daveenjoys.com/2008/07/14/netflix-a-movie-watching-extravanganza/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ClearPlay DVD Player.</title>
		<link>http://www.daveenjoys.com/2008/07/09/clearplay-dvd-player/</link>
		<comments>http://www.daveenjoys.com/2008/07/09/clearplay-dvd-player/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 02:41:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>davemackey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[household]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alcohol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ClearPlay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DVD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DVD player]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[filter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Home Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[violence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daveenjoys.com/?p=17</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://commons.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Heath_Ledger.jpg"></a>Image via <a href="http://commons.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Heath_Ledger.jpg">Wikipedia</a> <p>Movies and television shows have allowed us to experience entertainment in ways never before possible. We can travel the world, experience adventure, discover ancient lands &#8211; such a multitude of experiences is laid out before our very eyes. Yet at the same time the advent of <a class="zem_slink" title="Film" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Film" [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="zemanta-img" style="margin: 1em; float: right; display: block;"><a href="http://commons.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Heath_Ledger.jpg"><img style="display: block;" src="http://www.daveenjoys.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/202px-Heath_Ledger.jpg" alt="Ledger at the 2006 Berlin Film Festival Photo:..." /></a><span class="zemanta-img-attribution">Image via <a href="http://commons.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Heath_Ledger.jpg">Wikipedia</a></span></div>
<p>Movies and television shows have allowed us to experience entertainment in ways never before possible. We can travel the world, experience adventure, discover ancient lands &#8211; such a multitude of experiences is laid out before our very eyes. Yet at the same time the advent of <a class="zem_slink" title="Film" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Film" rel="wikipedia">movies</a> and television has brought much that we would rather not interact with on a personal or family basis. Depending on your individual and family beliefs you may have issues with extreme violence, drug or alcohol abuse, strong language, or explicitly sexual content.</p>
<p>This left many in a bind. Oftentimes the only movies that didn&#8217;t contain at least some of these elements where boring or childish. Great for when you have children &#8211; not so great when you get together as a family to watch a film or want something with more mature topical material for yourself. Even many great movies contained stunning &#8211; if brief &#8211; moments where they shot out some unexpected content. <a class="zem_slink" title="Ned Kelly" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ned_Kelly" rel="wikipedia">Ned Kelly</a> starring <a class="zem_slink" title="Heath Ledger" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heath_Ledger" rel="wikipedia">Heath Ledger</a> comes to mind with its unexplained and brief nudity. Awakenings starring <a class="zem_slink" title="Robin Williams" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robin_Williams" rel="wikipedia">Robin Williams</a>, a moving film about disease and a courageous medical doctor contains a brief outburst of strong profanity.</p>
<p>An entire industry rose up to combat these issues. Edited <a class="zem_slink" title="DVD" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DVD" rel="wikipedia">DVD</a>&#8216;s became very popular but were eventually outlawed by the courts as infringing upon the rights of the artist &#8211; manipulating the artist&#8217;s original intent. One vendor was found innocent of these accusations and continues to operate successfully to this day &#8211; <a class="zem_slink" title="ClearPlay" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ClearPlay" rel="wikipedia">ClearPlay</a>.</p>
<p>How does it work? The ClearPlay DVD player doesn&#8217;t require special edited DVD&#8217;s, rather it has a small storage space inside the DVD player on which filters reside. These filters contain logic that says &#8220;skip time 01:15:33 to 01:15:35.&#8221; Thus the DVD player seamlessly skips over objectionable content &#8211; or mutes it. These filters aren&#8217;t blanket either. One can customize the filters according to one&#8217;s personal preferences. Don&#8217;t want to see explicit sexuality but drug and alcohol use doesn&#8217;t bother you? No problem, you can customize for that. Don&#8217;t want to see extremely gory violence but normal wartime or drama violence is acceptable? Can filter for that as well. ClearPlay offers extensive customizability on a per DVD basis.</p>
<p>Well, this DVD player must be exceptionally expensive to offer such advanced and useful technologies, right? No! The device is right around the same price as competitive <a class="zem_slink" title="DVD player" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DVD_player" rel="wikipedia">DVD players</a> that don&#8217;t offer the ClearPlay technology (every device should utilize this technology!). Right now ClearPlay has two models available, one priced at around $70 and the other around $80.</p>
<p>This is because ClearPlay doesn&#8217;t really care about the cost of the hardware &#8211; it makes its money from <a href="http://www.myaffiliateprogram.com/u/clearpla/b.asp?id=1347&amp;img=rr_banner02_300x250.jpg"><br />
<img style="float: right;" src="http://www.daveenjoys.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/rr_banner02_300x250.jpg" alt="" border="0" /></a><br />
the filters. A subscription is $8/mo. with discounts available for annual, bi-annual, etc. purchases. These subscriptions allow you to download and install all the latest filters onto your DVD player. ClearPlay is constantly adding additional films to its list of filters. Or, if you don&#8217;t watch many movies you can purchase filters individually &#8211; when you feel it is necessary for the film you are watching.</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t recommend ClearPlay enough. So go out and buy one today &#8211; or at the least, next time you need a DVD player, make it a ClearPlay DVD player. It doesn&#8217;t cost any more than your average DVD player and even if you don&#8217;t subscribe to their filter subscription &#8211; at least you will have the technology available should you decide you need it.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been using my DVD player for around four years now without a problem! Thats much more than I can say for some other DVD players I&#8217;ve utilized. Two thumbs up for ClearPlay!</p>
<div class="zemanta-pixie" style="margin-top: 10px; height: 15px;"><a class="zemanta-pixie-a" title="Enhanced by Zemanta" href="http://www.zemanta.com/"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" style="float: right;" src="http://img.zemanta.com/zemified_e.png?x-id=7ed5fcf1-1c98-448a-b1ed-9e7ec27ddc5e" alt="Enhanced by Zemanta" /></a></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.daveenjoys.com/2008/07/09/clearplay-dvd-player/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.daveenjoys.com/tag/movies/feed/ ) in 0.50899 seconds, on Feb 10th, 2012 at 10:20 am UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 10th, 2012 at 11:20 am UTC -->
